Some thoughts

Do you have suggestions or ideas for improvement, post them here and we will them out.

Re: Some thoughts

Postby Igor » Sun Oct 21, 2012 11:08 pm

To delete advantage of first movement, just enough to make, as an option, random turns. First turn is: player 1, player 2 and player 3. Second turn it can be: 3,1,2 or 2,3,1 etc. Each turn can bring different position for each player.
Igor
 
Posts: 1291
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2011 2:10 pm

Re: Some thoughts

Postby piranha » Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:23 am

It would be incredibly hard to play with that because your enemy may get 2 moves in a row. Fast armies that get two move in a row for example would be a headache to protect yourself against.
User avatar
piranha
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1188
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 9:44 pm

Re: Some thoughts

Postby Jeremy » Mon Oct 22, 2012 5:54 pm

Warlords 2 had random move order. At the beginning of each turn, the order of the players was randomized. We ALWAYS played with it.

Did it make things more challenging? Absolutely. That's why we played with it! Much more challenging knowing that opponents might get two turns before you got your next turn.
Jeremy
 
Posts: 214
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 3:51 pm

Re: Some thoughts

Postby Jeremy » Mon Oct 22, 2012 5:59 pm

Bidding for going first is good in theory, but, in my opinion, is bad in practice.

Experienced players get quite a large advantage over new players. Many new players are likely to greatly overbid for going first.

Also, it would just be annoying to have a bid turn before the first real turn.

Going first is clearly an advantage in a 2 player game. But is it a noticable advantage in an 8 person FFA?

My suggestion -- let it be.
Jeremy
 
Posts: 214
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 3:51 pm

Re: Some thoughts

Postby Igor » Mon Oct 22, 2012 6:18 pm

To use 2 moves a row, player must be absolutely sure he will have not only last step in current turn, but first step in next turn. And if it will not, his fast and weak armies will be under strike.
May be this is last chance for a player going to loose, but might be interesting sometimes, if players could choose what turns will be, usual or random.
Igor
 
Posts: 1291
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2011 2:10 pm

Re: Some thoughts

Postby smursh » Mon Oct 22, 2012 10:08 pm

If this was going to be an option in game setup I think it would be good. Players that don't want to play this way would set up/play games with normal fight order.

Personally I think I would like to try some games this way. It adds to the uncertainty of battle, so you will be increasing the risk and potential reward of aggressive actions.
smursh
 
Posts: 437
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2011 4:05 am

Re: Some thoughts

Postby KGB » Tue Oct 23, 2012 1:06 am

I think it's totally fine to have Random turns as a game option. I personally would never use this option because after trying it in Warlords 2 I came to a very simple conclusion:

When you move first in the turn you must play very conservatively. When you move second in the turn you must play aggressively.

The reason is a very simple decision tree:
Move First: Best outcome - other player gets 1 move (neutral). Worst outcome - other player gets 2 moves (negative).
Move Second: Best outcome - I get 2 moves (positive). Worst outcome - I get 1 move (neutral).

So it should be clear that when you move first you must be conservative and not leave heroes out in the open or cities empty because the other player may move twice (imagine crows moving 40, Wizards moving 64, Sandworms moving 28 squares on desert maps like Outlands, Serpents moving 60 squares on water etc) allowing him to strike from twice as far away. When you move second you can take risks because you know the worst that can happen is the other player makes his normal move so you can legitimately risk a 60-40 hero battle because your hero may be able to win and then move all the way back to safely if you get the double move and you should definitely send fast units past / toward enemies since you have a 50% chance to rush past them.

The same ideas hold true with regards to buying 2+ production. Always buy it when you are moving 2nd because you have a 50% chance to give the opponent 1 less turn to stop it. But if you buy it when moving first they have a 50% chance to get 1 extra turn to stop it.

Bidding for going first is good in theory, but, in my opinion, is bad in practice.

Experienced players get quite a large advantage over new players. Many new players are likely to greatly overbid for going first.

Also, it would just be annoying to have a bid turn before the first real turn.


There won't be a bid turn. When you join the game it will tell you how much the starting gold will be and you enter a bid at join time.

As for experienced players getting an advantage what's wrong with that? Any one who plans to seriously play Warbarons more than a couple of times will figure out how much to bid and when. Turn order bidding should definitely also be a game option so you don't have to use it if you don't want to.

KGB

P.S. There are 2 annoying things that would happen with random turns: 1 - The battle history will be screwed up because you may have to look back 2 turns worth to see all the attacks against you making it harder for new players to understand what happened because the flashing attack / chat icons only go back 1 turn. 2 - The amount of time you wait between turns will also be randomized so that in a large 8 player game you may go 14 turns between your own turn which could be anywhere between 14-90, yes 90 days.
KGB
 
Posts: 3030
Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 12:06 am

Previous

Return to Wish list

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests

cron
Not able to open ./cache/data_global.php