Balancing Stacked Cities

Do you have suggestions or ideas for improvement, post them here and we will them out.

Re: Balancing Stacked Cities

Postby Chazar » Tue Jun 11, 2013 11:23 am

The problem of too strongly defended cities remains. I do not like magian's suggestion either, but there is a problem there.

So I would suggest to allow two-pronged attacks against cities. There is a small UI problem here, but allowing 16 attackers does not seem too much to me. It would also be fun to allow team-mates to attack together with two stacks at once.
Chazar
 
Posts: 670
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 7:51 pm

Re: Balancing Stacked Cities

Postby magian » Tue Jun 11, 2013 3:01 pm

Two-pronged attacks could work. Something along the lines of DLR's disease/poison could work. Units that can 'support' attacks from adjacent squares might work.

An interesting way of implementing disease might be to afflict a unit with a % chance to fail at whatever it is doing. So, a diseased orc would get a % chance to still fail after a successful ambush check AND a % chance to miss after rolling successful hits in normal combat.
magian
 
Posts: 348
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 11:17 pm

Re: Balancing Stacked Cities

Postby Chazar » Tue Jun 11, 2013 8:25 pm

magian wrote:Something along the lines of DLR's disease/poison could work.
I don't remember how disease/poison worked in DLR, but I am strongly against any battle effects beyond death that last longer than one turn.

No micro-management hell please. If would enjoy sorting out diseased units I would still be playing Dominions3. :mrgreen:
Chazar
 
Posts: 670
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 7:51 pm

Re: Balancing Stacked Cities

Postby magian » Wed Jun 12, 2013 2:24 pm

I never found warlords 3 to suffer too much from micromanagement. Dominions 3, well that game IS micromanagement. In DLR, disease lasted until a unit was blessed (at a temple or with a spell). KGB has suggested that a Warbarons version last a couple of turns.
magian
 
Posts: 348
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 11:17 pm

Re: Balancing Stacked Cities

Postby tabanli » Fri Jul 05, 2013 5:21 pm

One way to balance is to change the rule about the items after a lost battle. If you attack a city and you loose, your items ends up inside the city. However if we change that, them I can attack that city with my prime hero stack and kill as many as possible, but at least I will not loose the items. With good income, you will get L3-L4 heroes but great items are irreplaceable.

I usually encounter stacked cities problem at the Battlefield map, especially after I got the items from the center. My problem with the stacked cities is that they prolong strategically won games. Let's say I control 70% of the cities with all the right units, I have all the good items however my opponent has a high level Assassin and a good Barbarian sitting in a crowded city with all the right bonus. Now it is very hard to pass through that city to reach low def cities and it takes obscene amount of troops to get that city. One way is to use your prime hero stack but it is always risky, since once you expose your hero stack, your opponent may adjust the fight order. With the right fight order an inferior stack would have an edge against a superior stack.

Retreat option will definitely benefit high level heroes and pro-players. Just one more thing to learn for the new comers.
tabanli
 
Posts: 283
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 4:47 am

Previous

Return to Wish list

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests

cron
Not able to open ./cache/data_global.php