who is USA in Syria?

[Igor]

Today morning USA, with help of it's satellites UK and France, attacked Syria with mass of missiles launched toward military and peaceful targets. Without stating a war, without approval from UN.
This shows USA as country-aggressor, the breaker of international laws.

[fantastory]

I do not like USA interfering in other countries and I rather think they needed a way to show power.
But I must say any use of chemical or biologial weapons should be extinguished in the arch. A step to far here and we are out of this planet.

[Igor]

Russian media tell that Asad didn't this. Neither this time nor a year ago.
This fake news was born in organisation which is called in Russian media "White helms' (I don't know how is this called in West). Many articles try to proves that they were not victimes of the chemical weapon but just actors in the film. This is why USA didn't wait the result of UN investigation.
And Asad was the last guy who needed this. He is already win inside Syria, with help of Russian air force.

USA show agression too often. Iraqu (USA already confirm no chemical weapon was there), Lybia, now Syria. Too much fire on the East is made by USA. Eastern refugees fill EU countries, bringing a lot of crime promlems there.
There were only Syria/Asad inner problem but now they are the problem of EU people. (Thanks to US aggression)

[fantastory]

USA rockets are only increasing Asad's dependence on Russia.

[KGB]

This fake news was born in organisation which is called in Russian media "White helms' (I don't know how is this called in West).

This is called a 'false flag' here in the West.

This article has a nice list of False Flags by various Governments around the world in the 20th century. It's amazing how many there are.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-04- ... bing-syria

KGB

[Igor]

(61) Government officials on both sides of the conflict, as well as the snipers who actually pulled the trigger, all admit that shots were fired on both sides – killing both government officials and anti-government protesters in Ukraine – to create maximum chaos and destabilization.

(15) 3 b: We could blow up a drone (unmanned) vessel anywhere in the Cuban waters. We could arrange to cause such incident in the vicinity of Havana or Santiago as a spectacular result of Cuban attack from the air or sea, or both. The presence of Cuban planes or ships merely investigating the intent of the vessel could be fairly compelling evidence that the ship was taken under attack. The nearness to Havana or Santiago would add credibility especially to those people that might have heard the blast or have seen the fire. The US could follow up with an air/sea rescue operation covered by US fighters to “evacuate” remaining members of the non-existent crew. Casualty lists in US newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation.

Whether should add issue with MH-17 aircrash to this list?
There was some theory, amazing but interesting: that plane carried not living passengers but only dead bodies. New dead bodies, not so old. There were an article on that rebels named the 'victimes' looking strange as if they were already dead for a some time.
From sight point of (61) and especially (15) this amazing theory may be looking more truthful. Especialy if to count that US satellite was over that place exactly in that time, and no photo were published.
USA then blamed Russia without any investigation results.
Russia and Eastern rebels got nothing good after this aircrash but Ukrainian regime got wide poitical support they needed.

[Igor]

(34) The U.S. falsely blamed Iraq for playing a role in the 9/11 attacks – as shown by a memo from the defense secretary – as one of the main justifications for launching the Iraq war.

Even after the 9/11 Commission admitted that there was no connection, Dick Cheney said that the evidence is “overwhelming” that al Qaeda had a relationship with Saddam Hussein’s regime, that Cheney “probably” had information unavailable to the Commission, and that the media was not ‘doing their homework’ in reporting such ties. Top U.S. government officials now admit that the Iraq war was really launched for oil … not 9/11 or weapons of mass destruction.

Despite previous “lone wolf” claims, many U.S. government officials now say that 9/11 was state-sponsored terror; but Iraq was not the state which backed the hijackers. (Many U.S. officials have alleged that 9/11 was a false flag operation by rogue elements of the U.S. government; but such a claim is beyond the scope of this discussion. The key point is that the U.S. falsely blamed it on Iraq, when it knew Iraq had nothing to do with it.).

(Additionally, the same judge who has shielded the Saudis for any liability for funding 9/11 has awarded a default judgment against Iran for $10.5 billion for carrying out 9/11 … even though no one seriously believes that Iran had any part in 9/11.)


There was a film in Russian TV about the tragedy, where American authors proved that the crash was made not by aircrafts but by somebody 'from land' after special preparing of the buildings for to be crashed.

[KGB]

Whether should add issue with MH-17 aircrash to this list?
There was some theory, amazing but interesting: that plane carried not living passengers but only dead bodies. New dead bodies, not so old. There were an article on that rebels named the 'victimes' looking strange as if they were already dead for a some time.
From sight point of (61) and especially (15) this amazing theory may be looking more truthful. Especialy if to count that US satellite was over that place exactly in that time, and no photo were published.
USA then blamed Russia without any investigation results.
Russia and Eastern rebels got nothing good after this aircrash but Ukrainian regime got wide poitical support they needed.

There are some here who have suggested this event was indeed another false flag.

The victims must have been real whether it was a false flag event or not. Because there were 200+ live passengers on that aircraft and even if they just put dead bodies on there where did the passengers go? They had to have been killed because if any ever turned up alive it would prove it was a hoax.

KGB

[KGB]

Looks like Armenia is next up on the list of countries about to undergo a 'regime change' similar to the one that happened in Ukraine.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-04- ... s-protests

KGB

[Igor]

That theory about MH-17 supposed that no one living passenger was on the board but only dead bodies.
Too amazing but looking interesting. After reading the point (15) may suppose that this theory has become a little less amazing.
To check it should investigate too many facts connected who was on the board, what did he/she did last 1-2 days before the flight and who contacted them those days, also who took bodies after the crash etc.
If to belive it a little then interesting was the crew alive till the crash or this was auto-pilot (if this is possible for such big plane). Though as far as there is no information what the victimes did last days, no ability to check out the theory.

In Armenia, looks as another revoution in post-Soviet countries. Seems peaceful one, with no shots. Interesting whether this will be the way to improve the life or just way to change one clan to another. Anyway looks good that probably this is going without inner war.