LPhillips wrote:So if you use +35 Leadership and +10 Morale, then the enemy cancels 10 of it, you get +30 to each unit. If they cancel 17 of it, you get +28 to each unit. If you use -18 Chaos and -5 Fear, and the enemy brings a Crusader, then -15 is applied to the enemy army. If they bring a +9 Leadership Paladin instead, -14 is applied.
Correct.
LPhillips wrote:I think innate antiflier does not have the cap applied, as it increases the base strength instead of counting as a bonus.
Correct again. This is a bug I believe in how Anti-Air is applied since it comes into play DURING battle since it's situational, not before when bonus's are calculated and capped.
In reality I'd like to see Anti-Air simply become it's own bonus not tied to Leadership/Chaos and not be able to be Negated by an Archon. Then in the new hero system that is being developed it can be one of the hero stack powers that is different than Leader/Chaos/Gp Ambush so that there is another hero skill.
LPhillips wrote:Now how about +Attack, +Defense, and +Terrain? My memory is foggy there. This is important, and even more so when applying the negative! If I bring a -18 Paladin and the enemy has Heavy Cavalry on Open terrain, is the full -18 applied? They're getting +10 Terrain, so shouldn't I be able to counter 3 of that in addition to my -15 cap? So I guess it's really two questions. Are the terrain/attack/defense bonuses applied before or after the positive cap, and before or after the negative cap?
Stack bonus's (Leader/Morale/Walls/Chaos/Fear/Siege/Negates) are worked out entirely. Then they are capped in the -15/+30 range. So they do not carry over into individual bonus like terrain/attack/defense/swarm. IMHO that is how it should be because it would be strange to give -18 to a Hv Calv but only -15 to a Gryphon in same stack. It would be impossible to show 1 value.
That's why in the screen layout I proposed I broke things into distinct areas for Individual and Group bonus's and noted that the cap was applied within the each main area (Individual/Group) and then each sub area as appropriate.
The whole thing is so confusing now which is why I think it needs a major revisit. Ideally in 0.9 but definitely by 1.0.
KGB